Magnifying Glass

Show More

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

The Referendum in Crimea

Donate

On March 16, 2014, a referendum was held in Crimea on the issue of changing the status of the Autonomous Republic. And it passed with a record 80% turnout and a record 96% vote for Russia.
Aside of the fact that local referendums are against Ukrainian constitution we will try to analyze whether people even had a chance to actually choose between Russia and Ukraine.
Short answer is NO. But let’s take a closer look.
First of all the options in the bulletins were:
1) Do you support merge of Crimea with Russia as a subordinate entity of the Russian Federation?
2) Do you support the reenactment of the Republic of Crimea Constitution as of 1992 and the status of Crimea as a part of Ukraine?
And though the second option seem to be “for Ukraine” in fact the Republic of Crimea Constitution as of 1992 declares Crimea an independent state which may or may not delegate some power to Ukrainian government if and when it wishes [1]. So it actually just tricked those, who didn’t know. And in fact the options voters had were:
Screen Shot 2014-04-08 at 11.26.52 PM
Quite a choice, hah?
No wonder that those, who wanted to stay in Ukraine, boycotted this “referendum”, right? They just didn’t get an option.
So from where did they get that 80% appearance and the exit polls, you’d ask? Easy.
First, at the referendum they used a “simplified” voting procedure of including people into the additional lists directly at the voting station on the voting day. And didn’t rule out the possibility that after the vote in one voting station the same people by the same procedure could vote in another voting station. And they allowed voting using Resident Cards, which could be made within 3 hours to 1 day upon arrival to Crimea.
So non-citizens of Ukraine could come into Crimea, make themselves a Resident Card, and then go and vote as many times as they wish and physically can. [4, 5]
And Russians (and only Russians) were provided all means to do so. 5 days before the referendum Crimean government with help of Russian troops seized and closed Crimean airport for all flights except for the ones from Russia [2]. And on the day of referendum they provided buses for those, who needed help to get to any voting station[3].
This way even in Bahchisaray Region with Tatar majority who totally boycotted the referendum, high turnout was reported.
But what about Crimeans? We all saw how glad some of them were after the referendum. How they celebrated and seemed to be happy and relieved by its results. Why did at least part of Crimeans vote for Russia?

These according to Russian propaganda were the options they had to choose from. And only Russian propaganda was present everywhere in Crimea. Ukrainian TV was blocked and replaced by Russian channels shortly after the referendum was called.[5] Ukrainian activists, who tried to raise a voice for Ukraine, were threatened, beaten, some were kidnapped and tortured.[6] What made a message about the only allowed point of view in Crimea crystal clear. People had only one happy option – to vote for Russia. All the rest was banned and muted as “fascist”.
And even for the case when people tried to protest against the unfair choice by crossing out both options:
Screen Shot 2014-04-08 at 11.21.58 PM
Russia printed extra amount of bulletins with a checkmark already placed in a right box:
Screen Shot 2014-04-08 at 11.22.13 PM
In addition to that Russia didn’t let any international observer in – for obvious reasons.
So as you can see, any way people could try to go – they’d end up with Russia.
Free and fair choice, they say.
Related links:
[1] Link to the Constitution of Crimea as of 1992: http://sevkrimrus.narod.ru/ZAKON/1992konst.htm (it’s in Russian, you may want to use google translate to read)
[2] http://in.reuters.com/article/2014/03/11/ukraine-crisis-airport-idINDEEA2A09Y20140311
[3] http://euromaidanpr.com/2014/03/14/bulletins-in-crimea-are-already-checked-in-the-right-place-busloads-of-russians-coming-in/comment-page-1/
[4] Estimate of the Committee of voters of Ukraine: http://crimea.comments.ua/news/2014/03/17/093520.html (it’s in Russian, you may want to use google translate to read)
[5] http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2014/03/30/222894/reports-of-multiple-voting-falsified.html
[6] http://www.unian.net/politics/898915-osvobojdennyih-v-kryimu-zalojnikov-pyitali-derjali-bez-pischi-i-moralno-izdevalis.html (it’s in Russian, you may want to use google translate to read)

Donate. Impact. Change.

Apr 8, 2014

Nova Ukraine

Nova Ukraine
Apr 8, 2014

Nova Ukraine

Nova Ukraine
Donate

On March 16, 2014, a referendum was held in Crimea on the issue of changing the status of the Autonomous Republic. And it passed with a record 80% turnout and a record 96% vote for Russia.
Aside of the fact that local referendums are against Ukrainian constitution we will try to analyze whether people even had a chance to actually choose between Russia and Ukraine.
Short answer is NO. But let’s take a closer look.
First of all the options in the bulletins were:
1) Do you support merge of Crimea with Russia as a subordinate entity of the Russian Federation?
2) Do you support the reenactment of the Republic of Crimea Constitution as of 1992 and the status of Crimea as a part of Ukraine?
And though the second option seem to be “for Ukraine” in fact the Republic of Crimea Constitution as of 1992 declares Crimea an independent state which may or may not delegate some power to Ukrainian government if and when it wishes [1]. So it actually just tricked those, who didn’t know. And in fact the options voters had were:
Screen Shot 2014-04-08 at 11.26.52 PM
Quite a choice, hah?
No wonder that those, who wanted to stay in Ukraine, boycotted this “referendum”, right? They just didn’t get an option.
So from where did they get that 80% appearance and the exit polls, you’d ask? Easy.
First, at the referendum they used a “simplified” voting procedure of including people into the additional lists directly at the voting station on the voting day. And didn’t rule out the possibility that after the vote in one voting station the same people by the same procedure could vote in another voting station. And they allowed voting using Resident Cards, which could be made within 3 hours to 1 day upon arrival to Crimea.
So non-citizens of Ukraine could come into Crimea, make themselves a Resident Card, and then go and vote as many times as they wish and physically can. [4, 5]
And Russians (and only Russians) were provided all means to do so. 5 days before the referendum Crimean government with help of Russian troops seized and closed Crimean airport for all flights except for the ones from Russia [2]. And on the day of referendum they provided buses for those, who needed help to get to any voting station[3].
This way even in Bahchisaray Region with Tatar majority who totally boycotted the referendum, high turnout was reported.
But what about Crimeans? We all saw how glad some of them were after the referendum. How they celebrated and seemed to be happy and relieved by its results. Why did at least part of Crimeans vote for Russia?

These according to Russian propaganda were the options they had to choose from. And only Russian propaganda was present everywhere in Crimea. Ukrainian TV was blocked and replaced by Russian channels shortly after the referendum was called.[5] Ukrainian activists, who tried to raise a voice for Ukraine, were threatened, beaten, some were kidnapped and tortured.[6] What made a message about the only allowed point of view in Crimea crystal clear. People had only one happy option – to vote for Russia. All the rest was banned and muted as “fascist”.
And even for the case when people tried to protest against the unfair choice by crossing out both options:
Screen Shot 2014-04-08 at 11.21.58 PM
Russia printed extra amount of bulletins with a checkmark already placed in a right box:
Screen Shot 2014-04-08 at 11.22.13 PM
In addition to that Russia didn’t let any international observer in – for obvious reasons.
So as you can see, any way people could try to go – they’d end up with Russia.
Free and fair choice, they say.
Related links:
[1] Link to the Constitution of Crimea as of 1992: http://sevkrimrus.narod.ru/ZAKON/1992konst.htm (it’s in Russian, you may want to use google translate to read)
[2] http://in.reuters.com/article/2014/03/11/ukraine-crisis-airport-idINDEEA2A09Y20140311
[3] http://euromaidanpr.com/2014/03/14/bulletins-in-crimea-are-already-checked-in-the-right-place-busloads-of-russians-coming-in/comment-page-1/
[4] Estimate of the Committee of voters of Ukraine: http://crimea.comments.ua/news/2014/03/17/093520.html (it’s in Russian, you may want to use google translate to read)
[5] http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2014/03/30/222894/reports-of-multiple-voting-falsified.html
[6] http://www.unian.net/politics/898915-osvobojdennyih-v-kryimu-zalojnikov-pyitali-derjali-bez-pischi-i-moralno-izdevalis.html (it’s in Russian, you may want to use google translate to read)

Donate. Impact. Change.

We greatly value your support, and it is indeed crucial. Please consider donating monthly. Your consistent contributions are vital to sustaining our efforts and driving meaningful change over time. Your commitment will make a lasting difference, and we sincerely appreciate your consideration.

Back to Newsroom

Latest Posts

Oct 4, 2026

Last-Minute Push for Russia Sanctions Bill

The American Coalition for Ukraine’s (ACU) fall Ukraine Action Summit arrived at a pivotal moment: the final days before the House vote on the Russia sanctions bill.As lawmakers weighed their positions, advocates for Ukraine met with them as constituents, in some cases becoming the last people to make a direct appeal before the vote.Interviews with participants offer a close-up view of those tense hours: lawmakers’ hesitation, advocates’ arguments, and the effort to turn uncertainty into support and a “yes” vote.Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) had spent more than a year pressing Congress to adopt sweeping new sanctions against Russia. Weeks after his death in July, the Senate renamed the legislation in his honor and passed it 86 to 11, an overwhelming bipartisan vote that sent the measure to the House.

The Space Robotics Team from UCU pose with their entry
Oct 3, 2026

Ukrainian Students Excel in Space Robotics Competition

Perhaps those wondering what the future holds for Ukraine should look to outer space. The Space Robotics team from Ukrainian Catholic University had an impressive performance at the 2026 European Rover Challenge last month, marking the first time a Ukrainian team has participated in the international competition and shining a spotlight on the skills of Ukraine’s best and brightest students. The Ukrainian team, with the support of Nova Ukraine and other sponsors, reached the finals of the competition, finishing in the top 20 among 124 other teams from across Europe. The event took place Sept. 4-6 in Krakow, Poland. The competition required the teams’ rovers to perform several tasks that simulated a Mars mission. The vehicles navigated across rough terrain, collected samples using a robotic arm, and worked alongside a drone to scout the area. The competition tested the performance of the entire system, including communications, navigation, mechanics, electronics, and autonomous behavior.

Heal
Oct 3, 2026

Nova Ukraine and Scanlan Group Unite to Improve Surgical Healthcare in Ukraine

Nova Ukraine has just delivered a generous donation of precision surgical tools from Scanlan Group to vital emergency personnel across Ukraine. These new tools will drive better, safer treatment for the people of Ukraine, especially those suffering from illness and injury caused by Russia’s ongoing full-scale invasion. Scanlan Group is one of the world’s leading producers of high-precision surgical tools. When Nova Ukraine reached out, they delivered their best. The tools are already in the hands of surgeons across Ukraine: recipient organizations include the Shalimov National Scientific Center of Surgery and Transplantation, the Strazhesko National Scientific Center of Cardiology, Clinical and Regenerative Medicine, and the Romodanov Neurosurgery Institute. The Right Tools for the Job In surgical intervention, microseconds and millimeters save lives. Scanlan surgical tools are the best on the market, and in the hands of Ukraine’s expert surgeons and emergency healthcare workers, they will both save lives and help Ukraine build the foundation for a world-class healthcare system for years to come. As part of the HEAL core pillar of Nova Ukraine’s mission, these tools represent both a vital response to the ongoing emergency and a profound investment in Ukraine’s future.

Oct 4, 2026

Last-Minute Push for Russia Sanctions Bill

The American Coalition for Ukraine’s (ACU) fall Ukraine Action Summit arrived at a pivotal moment: the final days before the House vote on the Russia sanctions bill.As lawmakers weighed their positions, advocates for Ukraine met with them as constituents, in some cases becoming the last people to make a direct appeal before the vote.Interviews with participants offer a close-up view of those tense hours: lawmakers’ hesitation, advocates’ arguments, and the effort to turn uncertainty into support and a “yes” vote.Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) had spent more than a year pressing Congress to adopt sweeping new sanctions against Russia. Weeks after his death in July, the Senate renamed the legislation in his honor and passed it 86 to 11, an overwhelming bipartisan vote that sent the measure to the House.

The Space Robotics Team from UCU pose with their entry
Oct 3, 2026

Ukrainian Students Excel in Space Robotics Competition

Perhaps those wondering what the future holds for Ukraine should look to outer space. The Space Robotics team from Ukrainian Catholic University had an impressive performance at the 2026 European Rover Challenge last month, marking the first time a Ukrainian team has participated in the international competition and shining a spotlight on the skills of Ukraine’s best and brightest students. The Ukrainian team, with the support of Nova Ukraine and other sponsors, reached the finals of the competition, finishing in the top 20 among 124 other teams from across Europe. The event took place Sept. 4-6 in Krakow, Poland. The competition required the teams’ rovers to perform several tasks that simulated a Mars mission. The vehicles navigated across rough terrain, collected samples using a robotic arm, and worked alongside a drone to scout the area. The competition tested the performance of the entire system, including communications, navigation, mechanics, electronics, and autonomous behavior.

Heal
Oct 3, 2026

Nova Ukraine and Scanlan Group Unite to Improve Surgical Healthcare in Ukraine

Nova Ukraine has just delivered a generous donation of precision surgical tools from Scanlan Group to vital emergency personnel across Ukraine. These new tools will drive better, safer treatment for the people of Ukraine, especially those suffering from illness and injury caused by Russia’s ongoing full-scale invasion. Scanlan Group is one of the world’s leading producers of high-precision surgical tools. When Nova Ukraine reached out, they delivered their best. The tools are already in the hands of surgeons across Ukraine: recipient organizations include the Shalimov National Scientific Center of Surgery and Transplantation, the Strazhesko National Scientific Center of Cardiology, Clinical and Regenerative Medicine, and the Romodanov Neurosurgery Institute. The Right Tools for the Job In surgical intervention, microseconds and millimeters save lives. Scanlan surgical tools are the best on the market, and in the hands of Ukraine’s expert surgeons and emergency healthcare workers, they will both save lives and help Ukraine build the foundation for a world-class healthcare system for years to come. As part of the HEAL core pillar of Nova Ukraine’s mission, these tools represent both a vital response to the ongoing emergency and a profound investment in Ukraine’s future.

Donate PayPal Credit Card Check & Wire Stocks