Magnifying Glass

Show More

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

The Referendum in Crimea

On March 16, 2014, a referendum was held in Crimea on the issue of changing the status of the Autonomous Republic. And it passed with a record 80% turnout and a record 96% vote for Russia.
Aside of the fact that local referendums are against Ukrainian constitution we will try to analyze whether people even had a chance to actually choose between Russia and Ukraine.
Short answer is NO. But let’s take a closer look.
First of all the options in the bulletins were:
1) Do you support merge of Crimea with Russia as a subordinate entity of the Russian Federation?
2) Do you support the reenactment of the Republic of Crimea Constitution as of 1992 and the status of Crimea as a part of Ukraine?
And though the second option seem to be “for Ukraine” in fact the Republic of Crimea Constitution as of 1992 declares Crimea an independent state which may or may not delegate some power to Ukrainian government if and when it wishes [1]. So it actually just tricked those, who didn’t know. And in fact the options voters had were:
Screen Shot 2014-04-08 at 11.26.52 PM
Quite a choice, hah?
No wonder that those, who wanted to stay in Ukraine, boycotted this “referendum”, right? They just didn’t get an option.
So from where did they get that 80% appearance and the exit polls, you’d ask? Easy.
First, at the referendum they used a “simplified” voting procedure of including people into the additional lists directly at the voting station on the voting day. And didn’t rule out the possibility that after the vote in one voting station the same people by the same procedure could vote in another voting station. And they allowed voting using Resident Cards, which could be made within 3 hours to 1 day upon arrival to Crimea.
So non-citizens of Ukraine could come into Crimea, make themselves a Resident Card, and then go and vote as many times as they wish and physically can. [4, 5]
And Russians (and only Russians) were provided all means to do so. 5 days before the referendum Crimean government with help of Russian troops seized and closed Crimean airport for all flights except for the ones from Russia [2]. And on the day of referendum they provided buses for those, who needed help to get to any voting station[3].
This way even in Bahchisaray Region with Tatar majority who totally boycotted the referendum, high turnout was reported.
But what about Crimeans? We all saw how glad some of them were after the referendum. How they celebrated and seemed to be happy and relieved by its results. Why did at least part of Crimeans vote for Russia?

These according to Russian propaganda were the options they had to choose from. And only Russian propaganda was present everywhere in Crimea. Ukrainian TV was blocked and replaced by Russian channels shortly after the referendum was called.[5] Ukrainian activists, who tried to raise a voice for Ukraine, were threatened, beaten, some were kidnapped and tortured.[6] What made a message about the only allowed point of view in Crimea crystal clear. People had only one happy option – to vote for Russia. All the rest was banned and muted as “fascist”.
And even for the case when people tried to protest against the unfair choice by crossing out both options:
Screen Shot 2014-04-08 at 11.21.58 PM
Russia printed extra amount of bulletins with a checkmark already placed in a right box:
Screen Shot 2014-04-08 at 11.22.13 PM
In addition to that Russia didn’t let any international observer in – for obvious reasons.
So as you can see, any way people could try to go – they’d end up with Russia.
Free and fair choice, they say.
Related links:
[1] Link to the Constitution of Crimea as of 1992: http://sevkrimrus.narod.ru/ZAKON/1992konst.htm (it’s in Russian, you may want to use google translate to read)
[2] http://in.reuters.com/article/2014/03/11/ukraine-crisis-airport-idINDEEA2A09Y20140311
[3] http://euromaidanpr.com/2014/03/14/bulletins-in-crimea-are-already-checked-in-the-right-place-busloads-of-russians-coming-in/comment-page-1/
[4] Estimate of the Committee of voters of Ukraine: http://crimea.comments.ua/news/2014/03/17/093520.html (it’s in Russian, you may want to use google translate to read)
[5] http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2014/03/30/222894/reports-of-multiple-voting-falsified.html
[6] http://www.unian.net/politics/898915-osvobojdennyih-v-kryimu-zalojnikov-pyitali-derjali-bez-pischi-i-moralno-izdevalis.html (it’s in Russian, you may want to use google translate to read)

Donate. Impact. Change.

Apr 8, 2014

Nova Ukraine

Nova Ukraine
Apr 8, 2014

Nova Ukraine

Nova Ukraine

On March 16, 2014, a referendum was held in Crimea on the issue of changing the status of the Autonomous Republic. And it passed with a record 80% turnout and a record 96% vote for Russia.
Aside of the fact that local referendums are against Ukrainian constitution we will try to analyze whether people even had a chance to actually choose between Russia and Ukraine.
Short answer is NO. But let’s take a closer look.
First of all the options in the bulletins were:
1) Do you support merge of Crimea with Russia as a subordinate entity of the Russian Federation?
2) Do you support the reenactment of the Republic of Crimea Constitution as of 1992 and the status of Crimea as a part of Ukraine?
And though the second option seem to be “for Ukraine” in fact the Republic of Crimea Constitution as of 1992 declares Crimea an independent state which may or may not delegate some power to Ukrainian government if and when it wishes [1]. So it actually just tricked those, who didn’t know. And in fact the options voters had were:
Screen Shot 2014-04-08 at 11.26.52 PM
Quite a choice, hah?
No wonder that those, who wanted to stay in Ukraine, boycotted this “referendum”, right? They just didn’t get an option.
So from where did they get that 80% appearance and the exit polls, you’d ask? Easy.
First, at the referendum they used a “simplified” voting procedure of including people into the additional lists directly at the voting station on the voting day. And didn’t rule out the possibility that after the vote in one voting station the same people by the same procedure could vote in another voting station. And they allowed voting using Resident Cards, which could be made within 3 hours to 1 day upon arrival to Crimea.
So non-citizens of Ukraine could come into Crimea, make themselves a Resident Card, and then go and vote as many times as they wish and physically can. [4, 5]
And Russians (and only Russians) were provided all means to do so. 5 days before the referendum Crimean government with help of Russian troops seized and closed Crimean airport for all flights except for the ones from Russia [2]. And on the day of referendum they provided buses for those, who needed help to get to any voting station[3].
This way even in Bahchisaray Region with Tatar majority who totally boycotted the referendum, high turnout was reported.
But what about Crimeans? We all saw how glad some of them were after the referendum. How they celebrated and seemed to be happy and relieved by its results. Why did at least part of Crimeans vote for Russia?

These according to Russian propaganda were the options they had to choose from. And only Russian propaganda was present everywhere in Crimea. Ukrainian TV was blocked and replaced by Russian channels shortly after the referendum was called.[5] Ukrainian activists, who tried to raise a voice for Ukraine, were threatened, beaten, some were kidnapped and tortured.[6] What made a message about the only allowed point of view in Crimea crystal clear. People had only one happy option – to vote for Russia. All the rest was banned and muted as “fascist”.
And even for the case when people tried to protest against the unfair choice by crossing out both options:
Screen Shot 2014-04-08 at 11.21.58 PM
Russia printed extra amount of bulletins with a checkmark already placed in a right box:
Screen Shot 2014-04-08 at 11.22.13 PM
In addition to that Russia didn’t let any international observer in – for obvious reasons.
So as you can see, any way people could try to go – they’d end up with Russia.
Free and fair choice, they say.
Related links:
[1] Link to the Constitution of Crimea as of 1992: http://sevkrimrus.narod.ru/ZAKON/1992konst.htm (it’s in Russian, you may want to use google translate to read)
[2] http://in.reuters.com/article/2014/03/11/ukraine-crisis-airport-idINDEEA2A09Y20140311
[3] http://euromaidanpr.com/2014/03/14/bulletins-in-crimea-are-already-checked-in-the-right-place-busloads-of-russians-coming-in/comment-page-1/
[4] Estimate of the Committee of voters of Ukraine: http://crimea.comments.ua/news/2014/03/17/093520.html (it’s in Russian, you may want to use google translate to read)
[5] http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2014/03/30/222894/reports-of-multiple-voting-falsified.html
[6] http://www.unian.net/politics/898915-osvobojdennyih-v-kryimu-zalojnikov-pyitali-derjali-bez-pischi-i-moralno-izdevalis.html (it’s in Russian, you may want to use google translate to read)

Donate. Impact. Change.

We greatly value your support, and it is indeed crucial. Please consider donating monthly. Your consistent contributions are vital to sustaining our efforts and driving meaningful change over time. Your commitment will make a lasting difference, and we sincerely appreciate your consideration.

Back to Newsroom

Latest Posts

Aug 20, 2026

Ohio Becomes Fifth US State to Tackle Russia’s Abduction of Ukrainian Children

(COLUMBUS, Ohio) Nova Ukraine applauds the Ohio State Senate for becoming the fifth U.S. state legislature to introduce a resolution condemning Russia’s forced abduction of Ukrainian children. The bipartisan bill (SCR 21) introduced by State Senators Thomas F. Patton (R-Strongsville) and Kent Smith (D-Euclid) “condemns the Russian Federation for the wrongful and illegal abduction, forcible transfer, and subsequent illegal adoption and indoctrination of children from Ukraine.” Ohio joins Maryland, Pennsylvania, Vermont, and Wisconsin to take up this issue. To date, only Wisconsin has held a full vote and adopted the resolution. Nova Ukraine Director of Advocacy Aleksandr Krapivkin says:

Nova Ukraine's new Vector of Resilience joint pilot project helps Ukraine's veteran support specialists address burnout and secondary traumatic stress.
Aug 9, 2026

When the Pain Becomes a Part of You

“Nova Ukraine's new Vector of Resilience joint pilot project helps Ukraine's veteran support specialists address burnout and secondary traumatic stress.” The program's first residential trainings, launched by Nova Ukraine and its partners, were recently held in Ukraine's Volyn Oblast. Mariia, a support specialist, almost didn't attend. Leaving the veterans and families she supported for three days filled her with guilt she couldn't shake. She worried about how they would manage without her. But when she found herself among psychologists, social workers, healthcare professionals, and community specialists who shared the same responsibilities, something changed.

A photo of a memory board created by Zmistovno students in Odesa, July 2026
Aug 5, 2026

Newsletter – July, 2026

A photo of a memory board created by Zmistovno students in Odesa, July 2026 Thirty-five years ago, on August 24, Ukraine restored its independence. Today, Ukrainians defend and strengthen it every single day. The United States and Ukraine are separated by geography and history, but united by the belief that people have the right to live freely and determine their own future. In July, Ambassador Erin E. McKee traveled to Odesa and Mykolaiv to meet the people and organizations living that belief: Ukrainians leading recovery in their own communities, supported by partnerships that last.

Aug 20, 2026

Ohio Becomes Fifth US State to Tackle Russia’s Abduction of Ukrainian Children

(COLUMBUS, Ohio) Nova Ukraine applauds the Ohio State Senate for becoming the fifth U.S. state legislature to introduce a resolution condemning Russia’s forced abduction of Ukrainian children. The bipartisan bill (SCR 21) introduced by State Senators Thomas F. Patton (R-Strongsville) and Kent Smith (D-Euclid) “condemns the Russian Federation for the wrongful and illegal abduction, forcible transfer, and subsequent illegal adoption and indoctrination of children from Ukraine.” Ohio joins Maryland, Pennsylvania, Vermont, and Wisconsin to take up this issue. To date, only Wisconsin has held a full vote and adopted the resolution. Nova Ukraine Director of Advocacy Aleksandr Krapivkin says:

Nova Ukraine's new Vector of Resilience joint pilot project helps Ukraine's veteran support specialists address burnout and secondary traumatic stress.
Aug 9, 2026

When the Pain Becomes a Part of You

“Nova Ukraine's new Vector of Resilience joint pilot project helps Ukraine's veteran support specialists address burnout and secondary traumatic stress.” The program's first residential trainings, launched by Nova Ukraine and its partners, were recently held in Ukraine's Volyn Oblast. Mariia, a support specialist, almost didn't attend. Leaving the veterans and families she supported for three days filled her with guilt she couldn't shake. She worried about how they would manage without her. But when she found herself among psychologists, social workers, healthcare professionals, and community specialists who shared the same responsibilities, something changed.

A photo of a memory board created by Zmistovno students in Odesa, July 2026
Aug 5, 2026

Newsletter – July, 2026

A photo of a memory board created by Zmistovno students in Odesa, July 2026 Thirty-five years ago, on August 24, Ukraine restored its independence. Today, Ukrainians defend and strengthen it every single day. The United States and Ukraine are separated by geography and history, but united by the belief that people have the right to live freely and determine their own future. In July, Ambassador Erin E. McKee traveled to Odesa and Mykolaiv to meet the people and organizations living that belief: Ukrainians leading recovery in their own communities, supported by partnerships that last.

Donate PayPal Credit Card Check & Wire Stocks