Magnifying Glass

Show More

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Home Newsroom Article

The Referendum in Crimea

Donate

On March 16, 2014, a referendum was held in Crimea on the issue of changing the status of the Autonomous Republic. And it passed with a record 80% turnout and a record 96% vote for Russia.
Aside of the fact that local referendums are against Ukrainian constitution we will try to analyze whether people even had a chance to actually choose between Russia and Ukraine.
Short answer is NO. But let’s take a closer look.
First of all the options in the bulletins were:
1) Do you support merge of Crimea with Russia as a subordinate entity of the Russian Federation?
2) Do you support the reenactment of the Republic of Crimea Constitution as of 1992 and the status of Crimea as a part of Ukraine?
And though the second option seem to be “for Ukraine” in fact the Republic of Crimea Constitution as of 1992 declares Crimea an independent state which may or may not delegate some power to Ukrainian government if and when it wishes [1]. So it actually just tricked those, who didn’t know. And in fact the options voters had were:
Screen Shot 2014-04-08 at 11.26.52 PM
Quite a choice, hah?
No wonder that those, who wanted to stay in Ukraine, boycotted this “referendum”, right? They just didn’t get an option.
So from where did they get that 80% appearance and the exit polls, you’d ask? Easy.
First, at the referendum they used a “simplified” voting procedure of including people into the additional lists directly at the voting station on the voting day. And didn’t rule out the possibility that after the vote in one voting station the same people by the same procedure could vote in another voting station. And they allowed voting using Resident Cards, which could be made within 3 hours to 1 day upon arrival to Crimea.
So non-citizens of Ukraine could come into Crimea, make themselves a Resident Card, and then go and vote as many times as they wish and physically can. [4, 5]
And Russians (and only Russians) were provided all means to do so. 5 days before the referendum Crimean government with help of Russian troops seized and closed Crimean airport for all flights except for the ones from Russia [2]. And on the day of referendum they provided buses for those, who needed help to get to any voting station[3].
This way even in Bahchisaray Region with Tatar majority who totally boycotted the referendum, high turnout was reported.
But what about Crimeans? We all saw how glad some of them were after the referendum. How they celebrated and seemed to be happy and relieved by its results. Why did at least part of Crimeans vote for Russia?

These according to Russian propaganda were the options they had to choose from. And only Russian propaganda was present everywhere in Crimea. Ukrainian TV was blocked and replaced by Russian channels shortly after the referendum was called.[5] Ukrainian activists, who tried to raise a voice for Ukraine, were threatened, beaten, some were kidnapped and tortured.[6] What made a message about the only allowed point of view in Crimea crystal clear. People had only one happy option – to vote for Russia. All the rest was banned and muted as “fascist”.
And even for the case when people tried to protest against the unfair choice by crossing out both options:
Screen Shot 2014-04-08 at 11.21.58 PM
Russia printed extra amount of bulletins with a checkmark already placed in a right box:
Screen Shot 2014-04-08 at 11.22.13 PM
In addition to that Russia didn’t let any international observer in – for obvious reasons.
So as you can see, any way people could try to go – they’d end up with Russia.
Free and fair choice, they say.
Related links:
[1] Link to the Constitution of Crimea as of 1992: http://sevkrimrus.narod.ru/ZAKON/1992konst.htm (it’s in Russian, you may want to use google translate to read)
[2] http://in.reuters.com/article/2014/03/11/ukraine-crisis-airport-idINDEEA2A09Y20140311
[3] http://euromaidanpr.com/2014/03/14/bulletins-in-crimea-are-already-checked-in-the-right-place-busloads-of-russians-coming-in/comment-page-1/
[4] Estimate of the Committee of voters of Ukraine: http://crimea.comments.ua/news/2014/03/17/093520.html (it’s in Russian, you may want to use google translate to read)
[5] http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2014/03/30/222894/reports-of-multiple-voting-falsified.html
[6] http://www.unian.net/politics/898915-osvobojdennyih-v-kryimu-zalojnikov-pyitali-derjali-bez-pischi-i-moralno-izdevalis.html (it’s in Russian, you may want to use google translate to read)

Donate. Impact. Change.

We greatly value your support, and it is indeed crucial. Please consider donating monthly. Your consistent contributions are vital to sustaining our efforts and driving meaningful change over time. Your commitment will make a lasting difference, and we sincerely appreciate your consideration. Donate now or learn how you can help.

Apr 8, 2014

Nova Ukraine

Nova Ukraine
Apr 8, 2014

Nova Ukraine

Nova Ukraine
Donate

On March 16, 2014, a referendum was held in Crimea on the issue of changing the status of the Autonomous Republic. And it passed with a record 80% turnout and a record 96% vote for Russia.
Aside of the fact that local referendums are against Ukrainian constitution we will try to analyze whether people even had a chance to actually choose between Russia and Ukraine.
Short answer is NO. But let’s take a closer look.
First of all the options in the bulletins were:
1) Do you support merge of Crimea with Russia as a subordinate entity of the Russian Federation?
2) Do you support the reenactment of the Republic of Crimea Constitution as of 1992 and the status of Crimea as a part of Ukraine?
And though the second option seem to be “for Ukraine” in fact the Republic of Crimea Constitution as of 1992 declares Crimea an independent state which may or may not delegate some power to Ukrainian government if and when it wishes [1]. So it actually just tricked those, who didn’t know. And in fact the options voters had were:
Screen Shot 2014-04-08 at 11.26.52 PM
Quite a choice, hah?
No wonder that those, who wanted to stay in Ukraine, boycotted this “referendum”, right? They just didn’t get an option.
So from where did they get that 80% appearance and the exit polls, you’d ask? Easy.
First, at the referendum they used a “simplified” voting procedure of including people into the additional lists directly at the voting station on the voting day. And didn’t rule out the possibility that after the vote in one voting station the same people by the same procedure could vote in another voting station. And they allowed voting using Resident Cards, which could be made within 3 hours to 1 day upon arrival to Crimea.
So non-citizens of Ukraine could come into Crimea, make themselves a Resident Card, and then go and vote as many times as they wish and physically can. [4, 5]
And Russians (and only Russians) were provided all means to do so. 5 days before the referendum Crimean government with help of Russian troops seized and closed Crimean airport for all flights except for the ones from Russia [2]. And on the day of referendum they provided buses for those, who needed help to get to any voting station[3].
This way even in Bahchisaray Region with Tatar majority who totally boycotted the referendum, high turnout was reported.
But what about Crimeans? We all saw how glad some of them were after the referendum. How they celebrated and seemed to be happy and relieved by its results. Why did at least part of Crimeans vote for Russia?

These according to Russian propaganda were the options they had to choose from. And only Russian propaganda was present everywhere in Crimea. Ukrainian TV was blocked and replaced by Russian channels shortly after the referendum was called.[5] Ukrainian activists, who tried to raise a voice for Ukraine, were threatened, beaten, some were kidnapped and tortured.[6] What made a message about the only allowed point of view in Crimea crystal clear. People had only one happy option – to vote for Russia. All the rest was banned and muted as “fascist”.
And even for the case when people tried to protest against the unfair choice by crossing out both options:
Screen Shot 2014-04-08 at 11.21.58 PM
Russia printed extra amount of bulletins with a checkmark already placed in a right box:
Screen Shot 2014-04-08 at 11.22.13 PM
In addition to that Russia didn’t let any international observer in – for obvious reasons.
So as you can see, any way people could try to go – they’d end up with Russia.
Free and fair choice, they say.
Related links:
[1] Link to the Constitution of Crimea as of 1992: http://sevkrimrus.narod.ru/ZAKON/1992konst.htm (it’s in Russian, you may want to use google translate to read)
[2] http://in.reuters.com/article/2014/03/11/ukraine-crisis-airport-idINDEEA2A09Y20140311
[3] http://euromaidanpr.com/2014/03/14/bulletins-in-crimea-are-already-checked-in-the-right-place-busloads-of-russians-coming-in/comment-page-1/
[4] Estimate of the Committee of voters of Ukraine: http://crimea.comments.ua/news/2014/03/17/093520.html (it’s in Russian, you may want to use google translate to read)
[5] http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2014/03/30/222894/reports-of-multiple-voting-falsified.html
[6] http://www.unian.net/politics/898915-osvobojdennyih-v-kryimu-zalojnikov-pyitali-derjali-bez-pischi-i-moralno-izdevalis.html (it’s in Russian, you may want to use google translate to read)

Donate. Impact. Change.

We greatly value your support, and it is indeed crucial. Please consider donating monthly. Your consistent contributions are vital to sustaining our efforts and driving meaningful change over time. Your commitment will make a lasting difference, and we sincerely appreciate your consideration. Donate now or learn how you can help.

We greatly value your support, and it is indeed crucial. Please consider donating monthly. Your consistent contributions are vital to sustaining our efforts and driving meaningful change over time. Your commitment will make a lasting difference, and we sincerely appreciate your consideration.

Donate
Learn how you can help
Back to Newsroom

Latest Posts

Language and Thinking program students attend a lecture
Oct 23, 2026

‘Language and Thinking’ Program Prepares Young Ukrainians for Future Leadership

With Nova Ukraine’s support, Bard College leads writing- and discussion-filled workshops on the topic of justice Students from across Ukraine developed critical reading, writing, and civic leadership skills in a new program this summer supported by Nova Ukraine. The tuition-free, residential program, called Language and Thinking Kyiv, was based on Bard College’s Institute for Writing and Thinking approach to learning and was led by students and faculty members from the school. A total of 29 high school students completed the three-week program, which focused on the theme of “justice.” Students read and discussed texts written by Václav Havel, Lesia Ukrainka, Martin Luther King Jr., and others, and zeroed in on topics such as freedom, responsibility, and dignity. The students worked in small, immersive workshops and practiced a variety of writing formats, including free writing, loop writing, and process writing—all in English—and then shared and discussed their work with their classmates to examine and refine their own thought processes. One example of their assignments was the use of dialectical notebooks, in which students write down their thoughts about a text they had read together, then pass their notebook to another student to add their perspective.
Ukrainian DSNS
Oct 15, 2026

Planning, Not Reacting: Ukraine’s Rescuers and Nova Ukraine Prepare for Winter Side by Side

On the tenth floor of an apartment building on Kyiv's left bank last January, Svitlana could not bathe her three-year-old daughter, Arina, or cook her a hot meal. After strikes on the energy system, they had gone more than three days without heat or electricity, in temperatures as low as -18°C. So she wrapped Arina in layer after layer and took her down ten floors of a dark stairwell to a heated tent that Ukraine's State Emergency Service had set up outside. There they could warm up, eat something hot, charge a phone and talk with a psychologist. Millions of Ukrainian families lived some version of that winter. When the power goes out, heat and water often go with it, elevators stop, and anyone who depends on electricity for medical treatment is suddenly at risk. UNICEF, which documented families like Svitlana's, observed that darkness and freezing temperatures intensify fear and stress for children. For the rescuers of the State Emergency Service, known in Ukraine as DSNS, a winter like that changes the job. They still fight fires and search damaged buildings after attacks. But when power, heat, and water fail, they also put up warming tents, install generators, and help residents get through the outages. Last winter left them, and everyone working alongside them, with a plain lesson: the time to prepare for an emergency is before it happens. Ukraine Is Preparing Earlier This Winter
Language and Thinking program students attend a lecture
Oct 23, 2026

‘Language and Thinking’ Program Prepares Young Ukrainians for Future Leadership

With Nova Ukraine’s support, Bard College leads writing- and discussion-filled workshops on the topic of justice Students from across Ukraine developed critical reading, writing, and civic leadership skills in a new program this summer supported by Nova Ukraine. The tuition-free, residential program, called Language and Thinking Kyiv, was based on Bard College’s Institute for Writing and Thinking approach to learning and was led by students and faculty members from the school. A total of 29 high school students completed the three-week program, which focused on the theme of “justice.” Students read and discussed texts written by Václav Havel, Lesia Ukrainka, Martin Luther King Jr., and others, and zeroed in on topics such as freedom, responsibility, and dignity. The students worked in small, immersive workshops and practiced a variety of writing formats, including free writing, loop writing, and process writing—all in English—and then shared and discussed their work with their classmates to examine and refine their own thought processes. One example of their assignments was the use of dialectical notebooks, in which students write down their thoughts about a text they had read together, then pass their notebook to another student to add their perspective.
Ukrainian DSNS
Oct 15, 2026

Planning, Not Reacting: Ukraine’s Rescuers and Nova Ukraine Prepare for Winter Side by Side

On the tenth floor of an apartment building on Kyiv's left bank last January, Svitlana could not bathe her three-year-old daughter, Arina, or cook her a hot meal. After strikes on the energy system, they had gone more than three days without heat or electricity, in temperatures as low as -18°C. So she wrapped Arina in layer after layer and took her down ten floors of a dark stairwell to a heated tent that Ukraine's State Emergency Service had set up outside. There they could warm up, eat something hot, charge a phone and talk with a psychologist. Millions of Ukrainian families lived some version of that winter. When the power goes out, heat and water often go with it, elevators stop, and anyone who depends on electricity for medical treatment is suddenly at risk. UNICEF, which documented families like Svitlana's, observed that darkness and freezing temperatures intensify fear and stress for children. For the rescuers of the State Emergency Service, known in Ukraine as DSNS, a winter like that changes the job. They still fight fires and search damaged buildings after attacks. But when power, heat, and water fail, they also put up warming tents, install generators, and help residents get through the outages. Last winter left them, and everyone working alongside them, with a plain lesson: the time to prepare for an emergency is before it happens. Ukraine Is Preparing Earlier This Winter
Donate PayPal Credit Card Check & Wire Stocks
Donate